As some of you no doubt now know, we have returned to the bone which, as Team UK, we have been gnawing at for some time. In simple terms, having come to the conclusion that the governance of the UK is no longer fit for purpose, what now?
We struggled – and we failed. Then someone pointed out that we were doing the same thing as everyone else: we were trying to find policies to meet what we thought would be the right thing for the UK. That obviously raises a question: who are we to think that we know what is right for the UK? Clearly, we don’t and so we realised that the next step (really a step backwards) should be to see whether or not there could be created a group of people who, regardless of their traditional party loyalties, could agree – by way of a start – on what we should be aiming to achieve.
That led on to the idea that there should be a number of “core aspirations” which were generally not controversial so that most people (or so we thought) would be happy to agree on the aims of those aspirations. Then, having built up a group whose members are prepared to work together to approach the problem of creating policies to match our aspirations (which would, of course, take us from simplistic generalisations to more detailed objectives) we would have a wide range of inputs and, hopefully, gradually come to a consensus on proposed action that was acceptable (as a minimum) by the majority.
Not so. We have started to fall at the first hurdle – agreement on those nine core aspirations. We have received some responses – in part through the poll that we put on Team UK’s blog site, in part with discussions on Facebook and in part from email exchanges.
Let’s start at the beginning. Here are the nine core aspirations with the results of the polls (bearing in mind this is day 4 so do not expect high numbers yet):-
1. To create an educational, training and employment culture in which all have the opportunity to fulfill their potential.
Votes: 9 in favour: 0 against.
2. To create an economic model where stability, sustainability and the mental and emotional well being of the people are as important as growth.
Votes: 8 in favour: 0 against.
3. To create a culture in which small businesses (the key to the provision of employment) can flourish.
Votes: 7 in favour: 1 against.
4. To reduce dependence on imported energy to a minimum.
Votes: 9 in favour: 0 against.
5. To reduce dependence on imported foodstuffs to a minimum.
Votes: 9 in favour: 1 against.
6. To create a social culture in which communities thrive on self-help and reduce their reliance on centralised state benefits.
Votes: 8 in favour: 1 against.
7. To reduce the gap in living standards between the richest and the poorest.
Votes: 9 in favour: 1 against.
8. To ensure that the weak and vulnerable are cared for in a proper and fitting manner.
Votes: 9 in favour: 1 against.
9. To ensure that the nation’s assets (natural and man-made) are properly maintained and improved.
Votes: 10 in favour: 1 against.
What I find interesting is that clearly 10 people have voted so there are a number of abstentions. What is revolting (to me) is that there is 1 out of the 10 (10%) who do not want the wealth gap to close and, even worse, do not want to see the weak and vulnerable properly looked after.
Still, we may be onto something: those in favour are in the clear majority at the moment. We shall see what happens during the coming weeks.
Then there were also two responses to which I want to respond. We have been accused of being too vague in the first aspiration on the basis that young people have a wide range of potential and so the aspiration is meaningless. I would not accept that: it is because young people have such a wide range of potential that we believe there is a need to rethink how we prepare them for adulthood and – although this is somewhat off piste – how we put things right if they reach adulthood without the required preparation.
The other suggests that our society is divided in many ways (agreed) and particularly by class where their differences are irreconcilable. Now, I may have completely misunderstood what lies behind that comment but to me it spells ongoing, never ending conflict. I just have to hope that this is not true.
Sure, we are all people who are better at hating than at loving, better at killing than at healing and generally pretty damn unpleasant (which is how we have come to rule the globe) but surely, after the carnage of the 20th century and the appalling conflicts (that word again) in so many different parts of the world today we, living in one of the best countries in which to live (where even the poorest are far better off than many in other countries), could try to head towards some sort of consensus, couldn’t we?
If the answer is “no” then everything that I have tried to do over the last forty or so years has been a complete and utter waste of time.
Incidentally, if you want to record your vote on the Team UK blog site, please CLICK HERE.